Telepathic Pulse-Sending & Force-Bubbles

Instructor: Rainsong
Date: March 7, 2015 (Saturday)

<Lionell> I’ve been toying with PK lately

<Lionell> it’s not work

<Lionell> *working

<Lionell> the “program the shell to push out” part, either I don’t understand it properly or I’m doing it wrong

<Lionell> or both

<Rainsong> Many people find that it takes time to get it to work, even if they _are_ doing it “right”.

<Rainsong> I imagine that it would be difficult to evaluate if you have trouble feeling the construct that is the base for the project.

Continue reading

Stone Tower Shields, and About Shielding Generally

Psionic Shielding is the practice of constructing defenses with psi-stuff.

The defenses in question can counter several different kinds of threats.

* Empathic overload is a common one.

* Shielding can also be set up to defend against psychic attacks. Such things are not very common, outside of sparring sessions, but when they happen they are not fun at all.

* Basic Shielding can even help to keep you from being upset or stressed by the thoughts and emotions of other people around you. This is surprisingly useful when doing public speaking, writing (sitting for) exams at school, and speaking up at meetings at work.

* Telepaths do not need to be told what Shielding is for, once they encounter the concept: other people’s thoughts are loud and chaotic.

* If you mess up electronics, Shielding can even help stop or control that.

* Shields can be placed around objects, such as houses, also.

These are just a smattering of the endless possibilities.

Why would such things be important? Here again, empaths and telepaths don’t need much imagination to figure this out, although many empaths are reluctant to use any defenses. They and various kinds of healers will find it easier to maintain their own health and sense of self if they are not being constantly bombarded and flooded by other people’s feelings, sensations, and symptoms.

Shielding is a fairly basic skill, and any competent energy worker should be familiar with a couple methods of defense. In fact, even if you’re “head-blind” (unable to perceive incoming psychic data), if you value your privacy, Shielding is not a bad idea.

This brings us to the “how to do it” stage. Most websites and books on psychic development, psionics, radionics, and/or magic tend to have a section on Shields of some kind. Most types are usable, with some kinds being more effective for some purposes than others. Also, there’s a pretty broad range of difficulty.

In this post, we’re looking at a simple but time-consuming method. It doesn’t take much in the way of strength. Concentration is required, but nothing too intense. And, best of all, there is very little skill needed. All these factors make the Stone-Tower Shield a great choice to start with.

A well-made Stone Tower is pretty strong, and is especially good for basic anti-flooding defenses. By “flooding,” in this context, I mean the empathic and telepathic kinds, not the literal water types. If you want to hold back water you need a force-bubble, which uses PK, and I’ve never seen it used against more water than perhaps a gallon or two.

To make a Stone Tower, close your eyes and concentrate on building an imaginary wall around yourself. Make the wall out of bricks or stone, with or without mortar. For most people, “with mortar” is better. Picture each rock or brick individually, and carefully place each one. It is useful to make some clear (plexiglass?) bricks or stones to position in front of your face. Expect it to take ten minutes or more –possibly 45 or more—to make the basic tower around you. Close off the top with an arch. It is a nice, strong shape for the roof. Tell it to stay put for a set amount of time, and then let it sit. Observe what –if anything- you feel.

Each brick or stone is likely to take ten or twenty seconds to put together and place. It isn’t unheard-of to take a few minutes per brick. Don’t worry about being slow. The “building” part is crucial to this Shield, so don’t take short-cuts.

Some people find it a little “claustrophobic.” It often feels close or stuffy…and very, very quiet.

Hint: if you are using imaginary bricks, it takes less skill to use the rounded decorative bricks made for garden borders than to place regular bricks correctly.

If you’re not concerned about it falling over or being damaged, you can modify this Shield to be just a filter. This variation is slightly more complicated, in that you need to concentrate on what and how it will filter. Instead of bricks, imagine making a frame of sticks, lumber, PVC tubes or the like, and drape imaginary screening around the frame. If you are “filtering out” electrical interference, I expect that copper screen would be the imaginary material of choice. For just random debris at the mall, mosquito netting is fine. This one should be faster to build than the stone construction.

Try it and compare the results.

The Usual Disclaimers

As you know, we have a seminar in the #psc_annex chatroom on most Saturdays at 6:30pm New York time. I’m not actually in New York, by the way, but that’s an easy city to find the current time for, on practically any online time-zone checker.

Most seminars start with something like:

“Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to another psionics seminar here at the social club annex. The usual disclaimers apply.”

For those who are interested, and who haven’t been around since the beginning of PsiPog, these are the “usual disclaimers” for our online classes:

  • Yes, we are discussing real-world psionics;
  • Yes, quite a few of us are gamers, but that is not relevant to this class;
  • No, we won’t be debating whether or not “psi” is real, but feel free to do so in the main chatroom or after class;
  • No, this isn’t a channel aimed at children. The average age of the regulars in the group is somewhere in the 25-40 range…teenagers are permitted, but please do not reveal your legal name or location more precisely than country _or_ time zone: This room is open to the public, most of the seminars are posted on the website, and there are some dangerous people out there;
  • Yes, you are welcome to be here even if you’d never even heard of “psionics” before tonight (much less have any experience in it) as long as you act in a reasonably polite manner; and
  • No, you are not required to do any of the activities at any time during class (you’re welcome to, but anyone can sit out at any time for any reason).
  • Yadda yadda yadda, blah blah blah blah.

Sometimes, there’s a “closed” series of classes. These have a registration before the beginning of the series of classes, and generally no-one is added once it starts. This is for convenience: each successive class builds on the one before, and this avoids the necessity of repeating stuff before continuing on. We haven’t done one of those in a while, and they probably wouldn’t be scheduled in the usual Saturday-evening slot.

Clear as mud, eh?

Don’t Do This

With any luck, none of the readers here is stupid enough to commit vandalism against ancient historic sites. This warning should simply be of the “Fluff-bunnies Never Cease to Amaze Me with New Levels of Stupidity” variety.

Don’t do what these morons did:

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/11/01/authorities-seeking-mound-vandals.html

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/11/02/vandals-admit-muffin-crystal-thingie-assault-at-serpent-mounds.html

In case the links stop working at some point, or in case you simply don’t feel like clicking on them, here’s the nutshell version:

A small group of idiots made or otherwise acquired a large number of orgonite pucks. They proceeded to bury them around Serpent Mound, thus vandalizing an ancient historic site. In addition to being rude, this is illegal. They made a video recording of their actions, and posted it on YouTube.

At least the fluffers made the investigation easier for the cops…

Book Review – How to Make ESP Work for You

Title: How to Make ESP Work for You
Author: Harold Sherman
Publisher: Fawcett Publications
City: Greenwich, Conn.
Year: 1964
Format: Paperback

Harold Sherman’s the guy who conducted a scientific experiment in telepathy with the arctic explorer Sir Hubert Wilkins back in the 1930s. His experiment turned out to be more like outbounding RV than pure telepathy as such, but, either way, it was well-documented and reasonably successful.

The title of the book implies that it covers clairvoyance, along with possibly telepathy and/or precognition. Mr. Sherman also lumps pk and healing under this category, and he does a pretty good job of explaining how to make the stuff work.

Modern readers might find his writing style a bit on the formal side, but that was the way things were done fifty years ago…particularly when describing one’s own endeavors.

This book is long since out of print, but if you can find a copy, it is worthwhile for the how-to information as well as the historical curiosity.

Definitely a thumbs-up.

Book Review – Energy Tapping, Second Edition

“Energy Tapping” is very similar to EFT (Emotional Freedom Technique). Many of you are familiar with EFT already. Authors Drs. Galo and Vincenzi based their system on Roger Callahan’s earlier meridian tapping method, much as Gary Craig did to put together EFT.

In the Acknowledgements section, the authors say:

“We are deeply indebted to the contributions of Huang Ti, who catalogued meridian theory approximately 4500 years ago; George J. Goodheart, founder of applied kinesiology; and John Diamond and Roger Callahan, for their contributions to the application of meridian theory in the treatment of emotional problems.”

You can see a few hints here that would indicate that Energy Tapping is primarily used for emotion-related issues. These “emotion-related issues” include the obvious phobias, trauma, anger, and sports performance matters. They also include addictions, blood pressure problems, and assorted diseases of the immune system.

Unlike Mr. Craig’s EFT, but quite in line with Mr. Callahan’s approach, Energy Tapping suggests a separate sequence of points to tap for each problem or set of problems. Each sequence is laid out in a manner that is very easy to understand and each one includes a clear diagram. Most of the diagrams are simple line-drawings.

My copy is a trade paperback. I don’t know how all the pictures and charts will translate into an ebook, if one is published. The charts and pictures definitely make this book very easy to use.

The text is clear and well-written, by the way. It is simply a topic for which diagrams are always useful, no matter what your level of skill with and knowledge of meridians might be.

If you are interested in meridian work – or you have an emotional issue you’re working on – this is a book you’ll want to add to your energy-working collection.

(If you can only afford one or the other, buy Donna Eden’s Energy Medicine first, but Energy Tapping should still be high on your list.)

Title: Energy Tapping, Second Edition
Authors: Fred P. Gallo and Harry Vincenzi
Publisher: Ner Harbinger Publications, Inc
City: Oakland, California
Year: 2008
ISBN-13: 978-1-57224-555-6
ISBN-10: 1-57224-555-7
The first edition was published in 2000. I have not seen it, and I do not know how much was changed for the second edition.

A Note About Book Reviews

This is just a quick note about the book reviews I post on this blog. In case any of you are wondering, the reviews are simply commentary of books we have here at the house, generally, for the general information of folks in our little community here. There may have been a borrowed book or two, but generally the books are ones on our bookshelf.

Nathaniel asked if I’d post a review of his book. As I recall, his request came after I’d emailed him, complimenting him on his book. I wasn’t able to post the review on the Amazon page, for some reason. (I don’t recall which type of glitch it was, now.) So, I posted it here. I’d been planning to post some book reviews and his was as good as any to start with.

Why am I telling you all this? It’s come to my attention that many online book reviews are written by folks who are being paid to provide favourable reviews. In some cases, the reviewer hasn’t even read the books in question. The reviews on here are not paid reviews.

However, the reviews are not entirely unbiased. (Are reviews ever unbiased?) In some cases, the authors are people I know and like personally, whether online or off. Hmmm. I should probably edit those reviews with a statement indicating this bias.

In any case, if I say I’d recommend a particular book as, for example, the best introduction to such-and-such a topic, it’s because I’d really recommend it as such. I might be wrong. And I might change my mind later, if I come across a better introduction. But, it’s my honest opinion at the time of writing.

Does any of this matter to you? Maybe. Maybe not. If you’re going to be paying your money for some new books (or trolling eBay for used or out-of-print works) it can help if you have someone else’s advice. That’s the idea of reviews, generally, after all. “Hmm. I’d like a new book on remote viewing. Should I buy this one or that one? Let’s see what other people have said about it…”

Or, you could ignore the reviews and just pendle the question. 🙂

Incidentally, even if you consistently disagree with my or any other reviewer’s book reviews, reviews can still be useful. You can avoid wasting your money by simply not buying the ones I or the other reviewer rate most highly.

And, of course, you have the option of not reading the reviews, too. 🙂

It’s all good.

Chickens and PK

Some of you might remember a nifty little article in Wired Magazine about chickens using what appears to be PK on a robot. It’s come up from time to time in the chatroom.

If you are interested in reading the details about the story, check out the following link:

http://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/9/jse_09_2_peoch.pdf

It goes to a PDF file of the journal article Wired’s story was based on. The title is Psychokinetic Action of Young Chicks on the Path of An Illuminated Source by René Peoc’h. It was published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, Volume 9, Number 2, pp. 223-229, in 1995.

As might be expected of an academic paper, it gives considerably more detail about the experiment. It certainly makes for an interesting read.

Associative Remote Viewing: Some Tips for Improving

As most of you know already, Associative Remote Viewing is a useful approach for solving binary questions, the kind that can be answered with yes or no. Pendling is another such method, but it has a problem sometimes. If the person seeking the data has a personal stake in the answer, it can be difficult to keep from making the swing of the pendant indicate the preferred result, instead of the real one. Associative Remote Viewing, or ARV, can help get around that problem.

At least, ARV can help get around that problem if it is approached correctly.

This particular blog post is not about the basic mechanics. It is about solving some of the difficulties. For instruction about how to actually do ARV, consult GregK’s website. (http://www.remote-viewing.com/) He’s got a nice, clear set of instructions, with friendly illustrations and practice targets. P-I-A.edu also has some great instructional and practice material.

I’m not especially good at Remote Viewing of any kind, so I’m always on the lookout for new ideas about how to solve common problems with it. Good, solid practice is the most obvious of these, of course, and I don’t do enough of it. Happily, remote viewing is not one of the psychic skills that dies off if you too much of it, the way card-guessing seemed to be (Targ, R., Katra, J,. Bown, D., Wiegand, W., 1995). Even Joseph McMoneagle needed to practice solidly to get a good handle on his RVing. The rest of us just need to buckle down (Gaenir, P.J., McMoneagle, J.W., 2002).

You already knew that you need to practice, though. So did I. What else can we do?

When you are first starting out, it is helpful to make your practice sessions as easy as you can, by avoiding obvious distractions. The usual advice is to have a snack to keep your tummy from rumbling and to ensure that other parts of your digestive tract won’t be nagging at you to attend to their needs, to put it delicately. This is sound advice.

Using practice targets instead of anything that actually matters might or might not be helpful. The jury’s out on that one. Try both. Do some practice runs with the targets on PIA or GregK’s site, or one of the other similar practice sites. The pressure is almost non-existent. To make a contrast, try a similar number of runs to predict whether or not certain numbers will show up in the next lottery. Specify the lottery, when you do so, and buy a ticket. How many numbers you “check” for is determined by how many practice runs you want to do. A sample target question would be: “Does the number 14 show up in the winning combination in Saturday’s TriState Pick-Six lottery?” Each question needs two RV targets, one for yes and one for no, but this isn’t difficult to set up. It will be more useful if someone else selects the RV targets, to avoid getting caught up in forced choices.

Were your results better with the added stress, or with the purely academic sessions?

There are all sorts of distractions which can interfere with a good session, including but not limited to your roommate playing loud music, your cat requesting attention, the strange and unpleasant smells from your neighbour’s unsuccessful cooking attempts, and the rattling of a cargo train passing within twenty metres of your window. According to Mr. McMoneagle and Dr. May, you can get around any of these by “adopting the proper attitude that these external things simply do not matter” (McMoneagle, J.W., May E.C., 2004).

It is also a good idea for the person who is selecting the actual targets to choose nice, easy pictures or objects, for beginners. According to Targ et al (1995), “shape, form and color are described much more reliably than the target’s function, or other analytical information.” A clip-art version of a bright red fire hydrant is an idea example, because it has a basic colour and a few basic shapes.

Avoid psyching yourself out, if the data you’re looking for is a bit in the future or the past. The evidence so far is that it makes little or no difference to your results (Targ, R. et al., 1995, and Jaegers, B., n.d.). Will you make mistakes? Probably. Everyone else does. Your mistakes in future and past targets are likely to be about the same percentage as for targets in the present (Gaenir, P.J., McMoneagle, J.W., 2002).

Happy practicing!

*

Gaenire, P.J., McMoneagle, J.W. (2002). Interview #001. PJ Gaenir’s Firedocs Remote Viewing Collection, RV Oasis Discussion Group Interview Series. http://www.firedocs.com/remoteviewing/firedocs-001-mcmoneagle.pdf

Jaegers, B. (n.d.). Personal correspondence.

McMoneagle, J.W., May, E.C. (2004). The Possible Role of Intention, Attention and Expectation in Remote Viewing. Proceedings of Presented Papers, The Parapsychological Association Convention 2004, pp 399-406.

Targ, R., Katra, J., Brown, D., Wiegand, W. (1995). Viewing Future: A Pilot Study with an Error-Detecting Protocol. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 9 (3), pp. 367-380.

Empathy

This being a condensed version of the seminar I gave last night, we’ll start with a friendly definition, so we’re all on the same figurative page. “Empathy,” in psionics, is the ability to sense other being’s emotions and to project one’s own emotions into another being’s mind. It is a subset of telepathy. I say “being” because it is not restricted to humans. Other animals have and are responsive to empathy. There is some evidence that plants might also be so, if Backster’s experiments with lie detectors are true.

Empathic projection is handy for several purposes:
*adding strength to other projected abilities ranging from telepathy to PK;
*hiding, by making it seem as though you are somewhere else;
*calming someone down by sending a wave of calmness over them (or imposing other emotions as desired in the same manner);
* making a performance more intense or believable, usually in music or acting;
*whapping people upside the head (or other places); and
*clearing out a room or to getting a specific person to leave.

During the seminar, K2 asked about the second point, because it is a little unclear. Have you ever felt someone staring at you? Other people feel that, too. So, if you are to the north of someone, and you make them feel as though they are being stared at from the west, and you _both_ know that you’re the only two people around….that other person is going to think you are to the west instead of the north.

Receptive empathy can be used to determine if someone is lying, or simply to determine what is wrong, particularly when dealing with someone who cannot speak (such as a horse). Sometimes, it can be used to cheat at chess or other games, by feeling out what the other person is going to do, in time to thwart it. I’m told that it can also be used for similar purposes in games such as poker.

From this small smattering of uses, you can see that empathy is not only a matter of being flooded and disoriented at the mall. (Shielding is your friend.)

For some people “how” to do empathic things is not much of a question. They are more concerned with how to make it stop. For these people, the important skills are grounding, centering, shielding, and cleaning of the field…often. Shields are our friends. Dampers are good, too. Hematite works well for some people, onyx and amber for others. Try a few and see if they help.

It’s also important to get enough rest and “alone time,” as Ayule reminded us.

Sending empathic data is not especially difficult for most people. Of course, doing it well takes practice. Stewing on something, particularly any of the strong “basic” emotions (rage, lust, etc) will tend to radiate outward whether you want it to or not. And the stuff sticks to things, which is why many people can feel the residue of an argument in a room, even after the people who were fighting have gone elsewhere.

Sending feelings intentionally, and in a controlled manner, is more easily accomplished by making a fake emotion, instead of using a real one. This isn’t nearly as complicated as it sounds.

Choose an emotion: strong, weak, mixed, doesn’t matter. The stronger emotions are the ones more likely to send accidentally. They are also the most useful for adding strength to strictly “data” types of telepathic sendings. When sending an emotion to a member of another species, it can be useful to choose images from their own cultures. For example, sunbathing in a safe place is a good image if you want to project “contented calmness” to a cat.

Once you’ve chosen the emotion, search your memory for a scene that evokes that emotion. The scene can be from your own experience, from a movie, from a book, from the news, or entirely from your imagination. As long as thinking about the scene reminds you of that emotion, it’s good to go. . Once you have your scene, concentrate on it, remembering it as vividly as you can, for a moment. As you start to feel the emotion it brings up, push it forward and outward from your tummy toward your target. It doesn’t matter where your target is – let the trajectory bend wherever it needs to go after it is already clear of your field.

If you want to add a little extra certainty to things, push in little short bursts, repeatedly, in time with your pulse. For most purposes, ten seconds is more than long enough. To be really certain, though, keep at it for a minute or two.

Using this approach, you can send a strong emotion to one person and the people sitting on either side of him/her won’t feel it. For a broadcast type of Sending, replace the tightly-focused push with something more like the ring of energy that goes out from an explosion.

K2 had a couple more good questions leading to the following two points:

While it is possible to track such things back to the sender, normally the recipient just feels as though the emotion is their own. If you want to send a mental hug, or otherwise want the person to know the emotion is being sent, you usually will need to add a telepathic message of some kind, even if the person cannot pick up telepathic messages.

It is possible to make the feeling be associated with a person other than the receiver or sender. I believe the easiest way to do so is to keep an image of that person in mind while sending. If you know the recipient has certain associations with that person, include those with the image. Otherwise, just the face, posture, basic shape, and possibly name.

Receiving empathic sendings is normally just a case of lowering your shielding.

If that doesn’t work, take a couple of slow breaths to calm your mind, and just ask yourself: “What is (whoever) feeling/sending?” The first impression to come in is probably the right one, if anything is going to come through at all. It is pretty much the same as receiving in any other subset of telepathy. Generally speaking, empathic data comes through more clearly than other telepathic data, but that doesn’t hold true for everyone.